really? no, really?
Aug. 29th, 2008 05:03 pmas seen in the age:
what about john mccain's candidacy makes him the natural choice for a supporter of hillary clinton? please, somebody tell me. i'm dying to know. is it his stance on health care? education? interventionism? 100 years in iraq? abortion? george w. bush?
i can only think of two reasons a supporter of hillary clinton would not vote for barack obama:a fit of pique childish enough to make ralph nader smile, or racism.
oh wait. there is another possibility: dementia.
i know i run the risk of alienating an anyone-but-obama clinton supporter or two with my response, but i have yet to have one explain to me the rationale for jumping from clinton to mccain (or staying home, effectively the same thing). your candidate didn't win? fuck, folks, the candidate i voted for for president has won exactly twice in my history of voting for president (three times, if you count al gore's victory in'00, when florida, which he won, was stolen; four, if you believe ohio in '04 was a repeat of '00). the point is, my candidate almost never wins. but does that mean i should start voting republican to up the chances of a better batting average? how preposterous. or perhaps i should stay home so as to not have my tender feelings bruised by the mean ol' electorate. yeah, right.
so, please—please—if there's a logical, politically-defensible and rational reason for hop-scotching from hillary clinton to john mccain, please explain it to me.
just before the convention a gallup/usa today poll showed that only 47 per cent of clinton supporters would definitely vote for obama. a further 23 per cent said they supported him but may change their minds and 30 per cent say they will either vote for mccain or stay home.really? well then i have but one question: what the fuck, people?
what about john mccain's candidacy makes him the natural choice for a supporter of hillary clinton? please, somebody tell me. i'm dying to know. is it his stance on health care? education? interventionism? 100 years in iraq? abortion? george w. bush?
i can only think of two reasons a supporter of hillary clinton would not vote for barack obama:
oh wait. there is another possibility:
i know i run the risk of alienating an anyone-but-obama clinton supporter or two with my response, but i have yet to have one explain to me the rationale for jumping from clinton to mccain (or staying home, effectively the same thing). your candidate didn't win? fuck, folks, the candidate i voted for for president has won exactly twice in my history of voting for president (three times, if you count al gore's victory in'00, when florida, which he won, was stolen; four, if you believe ohio in '04 was a repeat of '00). the point is, my candidate almost never wins. but does that mean i should start voting republican to up the chances of a better batting average? how preposterous. or perhaps i should stay home so as to not have my tender feelings bruised by the mean ol' electorate. yeah, right.
so, please—please—if there's a logical, politically-defensible and rational reason for hop-scotching from hillary clinton to john mccain, please explain it to me.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:26 pm (UTC)people are crazy.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:29 pm (UTC)I not talking politics to anyone in the family at this point.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:40 pm (UTC)As for the stay home approach, I have this to say: If you don't vote, don't complain about the guy/gal in office, 'cuz you did nothing to stop it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:43 pm (UTC)WORD.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:52 pm (UTC)yeah, as far as i'm concerned people who don't vote get the right to be mute for the next four years.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 11:46 pm (UTC)to refer to barack obama as a snake in the grass and attempt to use that to vote with the pit of vipers soon to gather in saint paul gives new meaning to the word disingenuous.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 10:12 pm (UTC)If McCain wins because of this, we will truly get the government we deserve.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 10:20 pm (UTC)Women voting for a female veep who's staunchly opposed to abortion is like a jew voting for Adolf Hitler.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 06:07 am (UTC)why don't we understand the truth about America?
Date: 2008-08-30 05:40 am (UTC)re: why don't we understand the truth about america?
Date: 2008-08-30 06:06 am (UTC)Re: why don't we understand the truth about america?
Date: 2008-08-30 09:57 am (UTC)This country is no longer owned by the America people, but by corporate America no matter who the President is. It's a sharade. Obama would be shot down in a minute if he tries to implement real change his way, whatever that is. So would McCain. They have to kowtow to the real power that be in this country to become President.
We are imprisoned. A lot of us are slaves. That's a fact. And we don't have any real desire to get out of the situation, because we're afraid. Afraid of losing what we do not have but are constantly told that we do have, or can have. The carrot is a lie that we continue to jump for.
Some data:
. The gap between the 1% ruling class in America and the working class is clearest and widest since the Depression.
. Mobility in the US is behind that of Western Europe for years. The average American owes far more than the average W. European who has more $ and vacation time than his American counterpart.
. Health care: Yeah, right!
No, I can't be optimistic about this reality. But, I'm willing to fight it tooth and nail, though :-)